Re: txi-ca.tex missing in texinfo repository

[Karl Berry]

Walter and all -- first, in txi-ca.tex, it seemed better to use
\dotless{i} than \char16, and also there was an erroneous \char{16} in
one case.

More interestingly, I defined 00b7 in UTF-8, and made the definition (in
Latin 1 too) use \cdot instead of $^.$.  I also defined a bunch more
"easy" characters in the latin blocks, many suboptimally, but that's
what we can do here.

To my eyes, unfortunately, the superscripted period has the better
positioning for Ldot and ldot, but \cdot has the better weight.  I could
play around with kerning and such, but I will await your views on
whether that is worth the trouble.

My simple test file below (for texinfo.tex only, won't go through makeinfo).

Karl

\input texinfo
@setfilename catalan.info

@documentlanguage ca

@node X
@chapter chap

Hello. @xref{X}. @thistitle

@U{013F} @U{0140}

@bye