[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rethinking @def*
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: rethinking @def* |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 20:30:16 +0100 |
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 09:53:04PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:40:32 +0100
> > Cc: pertusus@free.fr, bug-texinfo@gnu.org
> >
> > > Yes, and I consider this as bad. As I mentioned in my previous
> > > e-mail, such a change would ruin any fine-tuning of the formatting – a
> > > formatting that stayed unmodified for a very long time.
> >
> > We could see what the change would do to various documents once it is
> > implemented.
>
> How would you see that? Most documents won't see this version before
> it is released, usually years after it's released, because
> introduction of new package versions into distros is slow. Most
> complaints won't show up until many noons after Texinfo with these
> changes hits the streets.
I meant by downloading and building some manuals from the Internet to
find where the problematic cases might occur.
- Re: rethinking @def*, (continued)
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*,
Gavin Smith <=
- Re: rethinking @def*, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/26
Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/27
Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/26