[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rethinking @def*
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: rethinking @def* |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:40:32 +0100 |
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 04:17:08PM +0000, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> >> ... I consider this a bad idea. Whatever you are going to change,
> >> it will be backward incompatible, causing a lot of grief.
> >
> > It is only backward incompatible in term of formatting, not in term
> > of Texinfo language or syntax
>
> Yes, and I consider this as bad. As I mentioned in my previous
> e-mail, such a change would ruin any fine-tuning of the formatting – a
> formatting that stayed unmodified for a very long time.
We could see what the change would do to various documents once it is
implemented. It's possible that the change wouldn't cause a problem.
If it would break documents or make documents worse then it could be
rethought or abandoned.
- Re: rethinking @def*, (continued)
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*,
Gavin Smith <=
- Re: rethinking @def*, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/26
Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/27
Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/26