[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rethinking @def*
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: rethinking @def* |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Jul 2022 21:48:31 +0100 |
On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 09:23:54PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> As you noted, the name is in a typewriter font due to <code> rather than
> <strong> being used. Maybe we discussed this already, but I think we
> should reconsider this change.
I think this change is probably a good idea as it makes it consistent with
TeX. We should make sure that the definition name is accessible with CSS.
Earlier, we recommended using a "dt strong" CSS selector.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2020-11/msg00041.html
- Re: rethinking @def*, (continued)
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*,
Gavin Smith <=
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/26