cashew-s-editor
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [CASHeW-s-Editor] Symbols to use for components in editor...


From: R Bhagdev
Subject: Re: [CASHeW-s-Editor] Symbols to use for components in editor...
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:23:03 +0000
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2

Hi,

Yes, activity diagrams are most appropriate.

Quoting Andrew John Hughes <address@hidden>:

> On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 15:31, Ravish Bhagdev wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > We need to decide on symbols to use for our editor for composing processes.
>  I had suggested that we use UML diagrams.  But I guess we need some more. 
> We have following: 
> > 
> > Process (rect)
> > Flow (arrows)
> > Choice (diamond)
> > For parallel execution, we can use Split (as one line splitting into
> multiple going into different processes)
> > 
> > Any suggestion for start and end nodes?
> > 
> 
> Have you been looking at a specific type of UML diagram or just choosing
> arbitrary UML-like notation?  At a glance, activity diagrams seem the
> most appropriate to me.  An activity is defined as 'an ongoing nonatomic
> execution', and the notation includes initial and final states,
> processes, sequential branching and concurrent forking.
> 
> > What other will be required, we needed a few specialized ones, can u please
> tell me about that?
> > 
> Have a look at the OWL-s presentation on the website or the
> specification -- this defines the control structures that can be used. 
> Of the top of my head,
> 
> * Sequential
> * Any-Order
> * If-Then-Else
> * The two repeat constructs
> * Split
> * Split/Join
> * Choice
> 
> > I guess we can use anything for the screenshot in proposal as we can change
> later...??
> > 
> The screenshot is just a mock-up of how you think the editor will
> eventually look.  Final results will obviously differ.
> 
> > Andrew, if you can please suggest something and an example for the
> proposal....
> > 
> I'd recommend you show at least:
> 
> * Building up a process (the OWL-s part)
> * The scope for adding Haskell (Atheesh should really do this bit)
> 
> and anything more you can think of that's relevant.
> 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Ravish Bhagdev.
> > _______________________________________________
> > CASHeW-s-editor mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cashew-s-editor
> 
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Andrew :-)
> 
> Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office (e.g. Word, PowerPoint)
> attachments.
> See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
> 
> No software patents in Europe -- http://nosoftwarepatents.com
> 
> "Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history.
> `Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn."
> -- Richard Stallman
> 
> "We've all been part of the biggest beta test the world has ever known --
> Windows"
> -- Victor Wheatman, Gartner
> 






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]