Re: Trouble with gcj 3.0.4 (BasicPermission.java)

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <address@hidden> writes:

Mark> I think a branch is a little over the top for this release.

Perhaps.  I think someday we'll have to do branches.  Sometimes it is
helpful to work out the process before you really need it.  (With
automake I found I didn't know I needed a branch until it was too
late... so obviously that experience colors my perception.)

Mark> So I will just commit the workaround with the words FIXME, gcj,
Mark> workaround and/or bug.

Works for me, thanks.

Tom