[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NYIException
From: |
Andy Walter |
Subject: |
NYIException |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:46:47 +0200 |
Hi all,
a surprising lot of emails have been sent about that matter. It seems that we
all agree on that throwing *something* would be better than what we have
currently. The attached class is a summary of what as far I understood from
the emails most people here wanted.
Personally, I had preferred some standardised information about the JDK
version that demands for the missing feature, but I didn't get the impression
that many of you support that idea.
Is there anybody who can't live with the attached proposal?
Cheers,
Andy.
--
aicas GmbH
Haid-und-Neu-Straße 18 * 76131 Karlsruhe
http://www.aicas.com
Tel: +49-721-663 968-24; Fax: +49-721-663 968-94
NotYetImplementedError.java
Description: Text Data
- RE: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], (continued)
- RE: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], David Holmes, 2003/09/28
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Stephen Crawley, 2003/09/28
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Stephen Crawley, 2003/09/28
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Etienne Gagnon, 2003/09/28
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Stephen Crawley, 2003/09/29
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Etienne Gagnon, 2003/09/29
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Dalibor Topic, 2003/09/29
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Etienne Gagnon, 2003/09/29
- Re: NYIException, Dalibor Topic, 2003/09/28
RE: NYIException, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/09/28
NYIException,
Andy Walter <=
RE: NYIException, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/09/29
Re: NYIException, Per Bothner, 2003/09/29
RE: NYIException, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/09/29