[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NYIException
From: |
Andrew Haley |
Subject: |
NYIException |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:55:59 +0100 |
Andy Walter writes:
> Hi all,
>
> a surprising lot of emails have been sent about that matter. It seems that
> we
> all agree on that throwing *something* would be better than what we have
> currently. The attached class is a summary of what as far I understood from
> the emails most people here wanted.
I'm utterly baffled why you think that the attached class is
appropriate. There was a disagreement as to whether a subclass of
Error or of Exception is required. Last I heard, the promoters of
Error threw in the towel. Howver, your class says Exception in the
comments but Error in the code.
Andrew.
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], (continued)
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Stephen Crawley, 2003/09/28
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Stephen Crawley, 2003/09/28
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Etienne Gagnon, 2003/09/28
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Stephen Crawley, 2003/09/29
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Etienne Gagnon, 2003/09/29
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Dalibor Topic, 2003/09/29
- Re: NotYetImplementedError [Was: NYIException], Etienne Gagnon, 2003/09/29
- Re: NYIException, Dalibor Topic, 2003/09/28
RE: NYIException, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/09/28
NYIException, Andy Walter, 2003/09/29
- NYIException,
Andrew Haley <=
RE: NYIException, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/09/29
Re: NYIException, Per Bothner, 2003/09/29
RE: NYIException, Jeroen Frijters, 2003/09/29