Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

[Robert Lougher]

Hi,

On 12/5/05, Mark Wielaard <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Frederick,
>
> On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 21:26 -0500, Frederick C Druseikis wrote:
> > I'm using gjdoc-0.7.6 to test a new port of JamVM-1.4.1 +
> > classpath-0.19 on OpenBSD.  I'm trying to get gjdoc to do all the
> > classpath documentation.  gjdoc makes a lot of progress (it's
> > outputting stuff), but blows off by hitting an upper memory limit.
> >
> > My question is this: Should I expect that gjdoc will need to use > 1GB
> > per process virtual memory? How big?  (This may be transparently
> > satisfied on Linux; on OpenBSD I have to recompile the kernel. Bummer.)
>
> Running gjdoc over all of GNU Classpath at once is pretty memory
> intensive. I don't have a setup at this moment using jamvm. But a
> natively compiled (with gcj) gjdoc seems to have a top virtual memory
> usage of just above 300MB. So 1GB seems a bit much. But try generating
> documentation first of just one or two subpackages to see if that works.
>

Could you also run JamVM with -verbose:gc and send me the output? 
I've never ran gjdoc myself, but I'll have a look at running it to see
what happens on my setup.

Thanks,

Rob.

> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBDlD2+xVhZCJWr9QwRAmEzAKCnq+9RsN5f/gjR2W5g4hBCNn3stgCgmiz4
> zHjDNYYTionk4l3SDIIAGuY=
> =r/+u
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Classpath mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
>
>
>