[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: poll re: 2.3.x features
From: |
Steven Knight |
Subject: |
RE: poll re: 2.3.x features |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:10:29 -0600 (CST) |
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Alex Jacques wrote:
> I humbly submit a very small patch that I find very helpful.
> This adds a -Q switch that makes Cons run quieter than the -q switch. In
> particular commands are not echoed as they are executed and indications
> of successful status (e.g. "blah-blah-blah up-to-date") are not printed.
> Warnings and errors are still displayed though. Hence -Q is roughly
> equivalent to GNU Make's -s. I find that this makes it a lot easier to
> find warnings from the compiler, etc., in the output. The problem with
> starting command lines with '@' is that the commands are never
> displayed, so debugging Construct files, etc. is difficult.
Alex--
Good idea, good patch. I'm inclined to suggest one change in the user
interface: Rather than adding a separate -Q flag, we can make multiple
-q flags increase the "quietness" level.
% cons -q . # run quietly, suppress Install/Remove messages
% cons -q -q . # run very quietly, suppress commands and up-to-date
% cons -q -q -q . # run very VERY quietly...?
This would allow for a little more flexibility in the future for
fine-tuning which messages get displayed.
--SK