[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] A suggestion to the list manager
|
From: |
Eric Blossom |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] A suggestion to the list manager |
|
Date: |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:02:28 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 07:46:18PM +0100, Ulf Soderberg wrote:
> How about having a Reply-To: email header containing the
> "address@hidden" in addition to the To: header?
>
> /Ulf
We're currently configured so that a "Reply" goes only to the sender,
and a "Reply to All" goes to the sender and the list.
This gives everybody a choice.
Setting Reply-To: to the list makes it a pain to reply only to the sender.
Eric
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Physical layer for packet-based communication, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Physical layer for packet-based communication, Eric Blossom, 2005/02/03
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Physical layer for packet-based communication, Berndt Josef Wulf, 2005/02/04
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Physical layer for packet-based communication, Eric Blossom, 2005/02/04
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Physical layer for packet-based communication, Krzysztof Kamieniecki, 2005/02/04
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Physical layer for packet-based communication, Berndt Josef Wulf, 2005/02/04
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Physical layer for packet-based communication, Rahul Dhar, 2005/02/07
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Physical layer for packet-based communication, Bob Poortinga, 2005/02/07
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Physical layer for packet-based communication, Eric Blossom, 2005/02/07
[Discuss-gnuradio] A suggestion to the list manager, Ulf Soderberg, 2005/02/07
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] A suggestion to the list manager,
Eric Blossom <=