discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New server and software at gnuradio.org


From: Tom Rondeau
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New server and software at gnuradio.org
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:04:02 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

Firas Abbas wrote:
Hi,



From: Eric Blossom <address@hidden>

Hi Folks,

I've just cut us over to a new server running git and redmine instead
of trac and subversion.
Eric

Thank you for your and Johnathan and Matt efforts to run this project.

The problem (from my point of view) in git is that we lost the meaning of 
revision number. In past (with subversion), the gnuradio revision number can 
(some how) point to the development process so we know that some gnuradio 
developed projects can work without problems with a specific gnuradio revision 
number (for example as do some projects in CGRAN). Even some, revision numbers 
can be remembered (I remember rev 10165  for example) because there were major 
changes in gnuradio project.

Now when I see a gnuradio revision with random hexadecimal number (is it really 
random?), I totally miss the days of subversion!!.

Best Regards,

Firas

Firas,
I've heard a lot from both developers and non-developers about the issues from moving between subversion and git, and I understand the initial reaction. However, having worked with git over the past few months, it really does make things simpler and easier to work with other developers. It's not like changing your mindset from cvs to subversion. The way git works is pretty different. However, once you've gotten used to it, I think you'll start to see the benefits. (almost) All of those people that I have heard complaints from about the move to git, once they get over the initial learning curve, have all come to see it as a good thing.

For reference, I've found www.gitready.com to be a very useful resource.

Tom





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]