Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Scheduler enhancement?

[Marcus Müller]

Question arising: would you want the tag to contain the time when
general_work() was called, or rather the time of the first sample? Note
that sources should usually be designed to be blocking until there's
data available! That way, between entering general_work() and actually
having the first sample, a lot of time could pass. It might make a lot
more sense to let the block that knows the hardware handle tagging
itself, here.

Cheers,

Marcus


On 19.07.2016 23:00, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> On 07/19/2016 04:53 PM, Sylvain Munaut wrote:
>> I don't see why this has to be done by the scheduler, I'd do that in
>> the source, or even as a separate OOT that just inserts that tag.
> Doing it in the source means modifying each source to insert, but,
> maybe that's the right thing to do.
>
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>     Sylvain
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio