[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reasons for a GStep windowmanager
From: |
Dan Pascu |
Subject: |
Re: Reasons for a GStep windowmanager |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Jan 2001 04:58:20 +0200 (EET) |
On 6 Jan, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
>> The argument that one can disable a lot of functions (clip,
>> dock etc.) is a no-go to me, since the default RPMs found and used in most
>> distros are not
>> compiled like that and never will be.
>
> Should be easy enough to make them runtime rather than compile time options
> and have
> them automatically de-activated on systems where GNUstep equivalents are
> available.
Actually they are already. You can either disable them at compile time,
and you never see them again, or enable/disable them at run time if
they were not disabled at compile time.
P.S. I wonder why people do criticize and express so confident opinions
about things they never checked and don't know how they work exactly?
--
Dan
- Re: Reasons for a GStep windowmanager, (continued)
- Re: Reasons for a GStep windowmanager, Dan Pascu, 2001/01/06
- Re: Reasons for a GStep windowmanager, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2001/01/07
- Re: Reasons for a GStep windowmanager, ]d, 2001/01/07
- Re: Reasons for a GStep windowmanager, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2001/01/07
- Re: Reasons for a GStep windowmanager, ]d, 2001/01/07
- Re: Reasons for a GStep windowmanager, Dan Pascu, 2001/01/07
- Re: Reasons for a GStep windowmanager, Dan Pascu, 2001/01/07
- Re: Reasons for a GStep windowmanager, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2001/01/07
Re: Reasons for a GStep windowmanager,
Dan Pascu <=
Re: Reasons for a GStep windowmanager, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2001/01/07