Re: Reasons for a GStep windowmanager

[Philippe C . D . Robert]

Dan Pascu <dan@services.iiruc.ro> wrote (Sun, 7 Jan 2001 05:46:52 +0200 (EET)):
<snip>
> P.S. I think that before continuing this bitching about wmaker not
> providing stuff that it already does, people should consider getting
> familiar with its currently available features, and we can then continue
> the discussion from that point.

Sorry, but I think you missed the point here. At least *I* was never bitching 
at WM (or its dev team). If it is my poor English language which causes some 
confusion, then I apologise.

On the other hand, I do not see why you WM developers get so 'upset' when we 
are talking about another, possible replacement for WM in the context of GS, if 
you are focused on 99% non-GS anyway? I mean, if WM provides most of the 
required features, why then not just say 'hello, it's there, use it'?

cheers, Phil
--
Philippe C.D. Robert | http://www.nice.ch/~phip/