Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?

[Sungjin Chun]

Hi,

I, now, uses flattened structure because I have almost of
no interest in developing cross platform application, partially
because I am using only GNU/Linux.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adam Fedor" <fedor@doc.com>
To: "GNUStep" <discuss-gnustep@gnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 4:03 AM
Subject: Flattened GNUstep structure?


> Before I start making a lot of RPMs and other distributions, I want to
> ask for advice on the default layout of the GNUstep directory structure.
> Richard recently implemented a flattened structure (without the
> cpu/os/library-combo directories) due to several complaints about the
> difficulty of finding files in such a deep directory structure.
> 
> To-date he hasn't received any feedback about it. The question is, if we
> are trying to attract new developers/new users, what whould be the most
> useful directory layout for them (deep or flattened)?
> 
> Whatever we/I decide will become the default for all GNUstep packages
> (although anyone would be free to change it for themselves).
> 
> -- 
> Adam Fedor, Digital Optics            | Fudd's law of opposition: Push
> fedor@doc.com  http://www.doc.com     | something hard enough, and it 
> fedor@gnu.org  http://www.gnustep.org | will fall over.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
> 
>