Before I start making a lot of RPMs and other distributions, I want to
ask for advice on the default layout of the GNUstep directory structure.
Richard recently implemented a flattened structure (without the
cpu/os/library-combo directories) due to several complaints about the
difficulty of finding files in such a deep directory structure.
To-date he hasn't received any feedback about it. The question is, if we
are trying to attract new developers/new users, what whould be the most
useful directory layout for them (deep or flattened)?
Whatever we/I decide will become the default for all GNUstep packages
(although anyone would be free to change it for themselves).
--
Adam Fedor, Digital Optics | Fudd's law of opposition: Push
fedor@doc.com http://www.doc.com | something hard enough, and it
fedor@gnu.org http://www.gnustep.org | will fall over.
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep