[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?
From: |
Helge Hess |
Subject: |
Re: Flattened GNUstep structure? |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Jan 2001 21:56:43 +0100 |
Adam Fedor wrote:
> Whatever we/I decide will become the default for all GNUstep packages
> (although anyone would be free to change it for themselves).
IMHO for a binary pkg the multiplatform needs to be the default since
multiplatform can be stripped down to flat, but the reverse is not
easily possible.
Personally I think it really was a failure to allow a flat hierachy
since this makes the whole deployment much more difficult and
error-prone. Notably this has not only sth to do with actually using a
multiplatform environment, but also with having a single binary pkg
which is able to install on multiple platforms.
Helge
BTW: any Objective-C developers interested in working in Germany ? If
so, let me know ;-)
- Flattened GNUstep structure?, Adam Fedor, 2001/01/09
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Sungjin Chun, 2001/01/09
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?,
Helge Hess <=
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, David Relson, 2001/01/09
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2001/01/09
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, David Relson, 2001/01/09
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Sungjin Chun, 2001/01/09
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Jonathan Gapen, 2001/01/09
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Nicola Pero, 2001/01/10
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Nicola Pero, 2001/01/10
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Adam Fedor, 2001/01/10
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2001/01/10