[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?
From: |
Pascal J. Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: Flattened GNUstep structure? |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 19:11:19 +0100 (CET) |
+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+
| Flattened | Deep |
+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+
> * will it help in shipping a single rpm for multiple platforms;
+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+
| NO. Binary RPMs are mono archicture (v.3.x) NO. |
+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+
> * will it make easier to create different rpms for different platforms
> on the same machine;
+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+
| ? (probably no difference) | ? (probably no difference) |
+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+
> * will it help users in keeping more than one backend;
+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+
| NO | YES |
+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+
> * will it make possible to create a single rpm for multiple backends;
+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+
| NO. Binary RPMs are mono archicture (v.3.x) NO. |
| Well, we could make noarch binary RPM containing several |
| severay GNUstep architectures. Then: |
| NO | YES |
+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+
> * will it make easier to create different rpms for different backends;
+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+
| NO ? | YES ? |
+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ PGP Key ID: 0xEF5E9966 (o_
mailto:pjb@imaginet.fr PGP fingerprint: 00 F5 7B DB CA 51 8A AD 04 5B //\
http://informatimago.free.fr/index 6C DE 32 60 16 8E EF 5E 99 66 V_/
() Join the ASCII ribbon campaign against html email and Microsoft attachments.
/\ Software patents are endangering the computer industry all around the world.
Join the LPF: http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/ http://petition.eurolinux.org/
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, (continued)
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Helge Hess, 2001/01/09
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, David Relson, 2001/01/09
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2001/01/09
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, David Relson, 2001/01/09
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Sungjin Chun, 2001/01/09
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Jonathan Gapen, 2001/01/09
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Nicola Pero, 2001/01/10
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Nicola Pero, 2001/01/10
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Adam Fedor, 2001/01/10
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?,
Pascal J. Bourguignon <=
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, David Relson, 2001/01/10
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2001/01/10
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Christian Edward Gruber, 2001/01/11
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2001/01/11
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2001/01/11
- Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Jeff Teunissen, 2001/01/15
Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Frederic, 2001/01/09
Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Dennis Leeuw, 2001/01/10
Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Nicola Pero, 2001/01/10