[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH.
From: |
Pascal Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH. |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 17:47:42 +0100 (CET) |
> From: David Relson <relson@osagesoftware.com>
> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:31:32 -0500
>
> Having read the commentary on the GnuStep File Hierarchy, here're my 2 cents:
>
> Put GNUstep.sh and GNUstep.csh in Tools. Having them in Makefiles is odd.
>
> Tools is the place for other miscellaneous scripts (assuming they exist - a
> fact I'm too lazy to verify).
>
> I prefer "Apps" to "Applications" as a directory name. It's close to the
> app wrapper extension, i.e. .app, and it's the name used in OpenStep.
Let's stay consistent. When the user will have learned that to load
the GNUstep environment from .../Tools instead of .../Toos, he will go
naturally to .../Applications and not to .../Apps.
Note that we're not speaking about an CLI environment with access thru
a 300 b/s teletype. We're speaking about a GUI environment where the
users will only have to click on some icons with readable and
understandable names, not cryptic abreviations.
The advanced "users" can always run:
ln -s Applications apps ; echo apps >> .hidden
ln -s Tools bin ; echo bin >> .hidden
export PATH=$(echo `pwd`/apps/*.app|tr ' ' :):`pwd`/bin:$PATH
if they need to run applications and tools from the CLI.
--
__Pascal_Bourguignon__ (o_ Software patents are endangering
() ASCII ribbon against html email //\ the computer industry all around
/\ and Microsoft attachments. V_/ the world http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/
1962:DO20I=1.100 2001:my($f)=`fortune`; http://petition.eurolinux.org/
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/IT d? s++:++(+++)>++ a C+++ UB+++L++++$S+X++++>$ P- L+++ E++ W++
N++ o-- K- w------ O- M++$ V PS+E++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5? X+ R !tv b++(+)
DI+++ D++ G++ e+++ h+(++) r? y---? UF++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., (continued)
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Tim Harrison, 2002/02/28
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Nicola Pero, 2002/02/28
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Tim Harrison, 2002/02/28
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Adam Fedor, 2002/02/28
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Marcus Müller, 2002/02/28
Message not available
Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Erik Dalén, 2002/02/28
Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., David Wetzel, 2002/02/28
RE: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Bissell, Tim, 2002/02/28