Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possib le?)

[Tim Harrison]

Chris B. Vetter wrote:

> /me not. I'd rather see some work done to have GNUstep running on, say
> AmigaOS, than wasteing time on implementing themes.
>
> Ok, I take that back - I'd rather see URL handling *WORK* than having
> something superfluous like themes.

I understand what Ian's point was.

I look more at the 579 FIXME references in the core source.  That might 
not be the best method of evaluating what needs to be done, but it's all 
I have, barring any design or development documentation.

Now, as I say, I'm not trying to tell anyone what to do, or being 
ungrateful for the amount of work that has gone into GNUstep.  I just 
think that effort could be better expended on finishing GNUstep's -base 
and -gui, and removing any hacks, temporary solutions, etc. before 
worrying about whether or not GNUstep will work on Windows.


--

Tim Harrison
tim@linuxstep.org
http://www.linuxstep.org/