[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Light-weight GNUstep distribution
From: |
Tobias |
Subject: |
Re: Light-weight GNUstep distribution |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Mar 2003 18:16:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
> Here's something I've been wondering. Has anyone written an
> Objective-C preprocessor and runtime that's compatible with GNUstep,
> but which generates ANSI C code that can be built in (say) Visual
> Studio or another ANSI C compiler?
there is poc [1].
i have not tested it, but i (think i) remember some usegroup speaking about it
working with gnustep.
> I know some developers for whom dealing with gcc on Windows is a
> non-starter, though they'd really appreciate being able to build
> their applications using GNUstep on Windows and Cocoa on Mac OS X.
>
> (Don't ask me why they won't deal with gcc on Windows. I have no
> idea. I do say I understand the impulse though; a lightweight
> preprocessor that could integrate with the tools they're used to
> would help.)
integrate is maybe not what poc will do.
it will only allow them to use the same compiler, afaik.
cheers
~ibotty
- Light-weight GNUstep distribution, Jan Vrany, 2003/03/08
- Re: Light-weight GNUstep distribution, Martin Brecher, 2003/03/08
- Re: Light-weight GNUstep distribution, Willem Rein Oudshoorn, 2003/03/08
- Re: Light-weight GNUstep distribution, Chris Hanson, 2003/03/09
- Re: Light-weight GNUstep distribution,
Tobias <=
- Re: Light-weight GNUstep distribution, Tobias, 2003/03/09
- Re: Light-weight GNUstep distribution, Helge Hess, 2003/03/09
- Re: Light-weight GNUstep distribution, Björn Gohla, 2003/03/09
- Re: Light-weight GNUstep distribution, Graham Lee, 2003/03/09
- Message not available
- Re: Light-weight GNUstep distribution, MJ Ray, 2003/03/10
- Re: Light-weight GNUstep distribution, Helge Hess, 2003/03/09
- Re: Light-weight GNUstep distribution, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/03/10
- Re: Light-weight GNUstep distribution, Helge Hess, 2003/03/11