Re: Frameworks integration

[Nicolas Roard]

On 2004-02-27 18:21:53 +0000 Chris B. Vetter <chrisv@web4inc.com> 
wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 07:23:12 -1100
> Nicolas Roard <nicolas@roard.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > GNUstep itself isn't really well known (many people at fosdem 
> > thought we 
> > were a fork of windowmaker... -- sigh --)
> [...]
>
> *grin* I'm not surprised.
>
> And you musst admit you can't really blame them for that.

I'm not blaming them, but I think it's a very revealing point that 
something
is clearly wrong :)

> For one, we say "window maker is the standard WM for GNUstep".
> Personally, I think we should get rid of the 'standard'.

agree. But at the same time, it's *still* the best solution under 
X11...

> Second, Window Maker says "it was originally designed for GNUstep".
> That may well be -- originally. But since then, they moved off to God
> knows where...
>
> And third, they DO look similar.

yes. Which could be interesting in the end for gnustep, as many people 
were
in contact with WindowMaker look and feel and loved it...

--
Nicolas Roard