Re: Totally Gormless

[Armando Di Cianno]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

So, I've read the thread here:

On 2005-10-12 14:16:25 -0400 Adam Fedor <fedor@doc.com> wrote:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnustep/2004-01/msg00642.html

Is it safe to assume that that proposal, with the comments that
clarified it, are what's being implemented?  If I have patches that
better implement this proposal, or fix bugs, etceteras, will they be
welcomed?  I ask, because the discussion seemed to go:
- - proposal
- - suggestions
- - RANT RANT RANT
... and I wouldn't want to "break" something that someone else
expects/uses, but then again, it'd be nice to be able to say what is
correct, and what isn't.

Thanks for the link ... looks like it was posted just before I really
started using GNUstep. :-)

__Armando Di Cianno
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail

iD8DBQFDTVvmwgiTPLI9xhcRAlFxAJ9WahrUcHABmxS4JRhe9q1M4cMfDACggoJJ
PT5EuvrGqZlS6uHBoFOpZxI=
=QQ4d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----