[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ )
From: |
James Michael DuPont |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ) |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 01:08:58 -0800 (PST) |
--- Gopal V <address@hidden> wrote:
> If memory serves me right, Neil Cawse wrote:
> > ** now adding C#
>
> Could you point me to your source code ? ... (I've written 80% of my
> generator in python anyway) .... I think it will be interesting to
> see
> how your code handles function pointers , structs and tracing back
> typedefs
> to their original types...
>
> I have used Swig for python and found it grossly insufficent for my
> work ... (easy, but not sufficent) ... I finally wrote my own
> wrappers
> in C for Python ... which is a lot more flexible than SWIG
But did you report the problems or look how the swig generators could
be modified?
> ... I
> suppose
> that might be true for C# as well ... But to be sure, I need a peek
> at
> Swig - C#.
There is a Swig C#? That is news.
>
> My PInvoke wrapper is built from the idea originated from Rhys with
> X11#.
> Which is accessible from the dotgnu-libs CVS .. That concept of
> wrapping code without C call-ins , is as portable as PInvoke ever
> gets ... (Rhys is guy to follow for portability....)
OK, gopal, I will start by looking at X11# now. Warming up the printer.
mike
=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., David Leimbach, 2002/12/03
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/05
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Adam Treat, 2002/12/05
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Gopal V, 2002/12/06
- ADMIN: Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., David Faure, 2002/12/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/08
- [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ),
James Michael DuPont <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Neil Cawse, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Adam Treat, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Adam Treat, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10