[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ )
From: |
Adam Treat |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ) |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:20:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.7 |
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 03:48 am, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> --- Neil Cawse <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Should we be waiting for Binge from qt# project -
> > or Gopal your stuff?
>
> I dont want to wait.
Uh, Binge is producing compilable code and I dare you to find cleaner
generated code. It is also been designed to allow the seemless generation of
other wrappers/bindings. We are nearly done and fully expect to have a full
fledged binge by the end of the week and a new release of Qt# by the new
year.
> > let me know!
> > Do any of you bright people want to finish this\improve this?
>
> I am downloading now.
>
> >I might
> > have
> > some time in the holidays.
>
> Me Too.
>
> > Modifications off the stock are basically in 3 places:
> > in Examples\Clr. Two examples I created. Im using class to do my
> > testing
> > in Source\Modules1.1\clr.cxx (copied from java.cxx)
> > in Lib\Clr.swg - mappings
>
> Have you tested with pnet?
>
> mike
>
> =====
> James Michael DuPont
> http://introspector.sourceforge.net/
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
- ADMIN: Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., (continued)
- ADMIN: Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., David Faure, 2002/12/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/08
- [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Neil Cawse, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ),
Adam Treat <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Adam Treat, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., David Sugar, 2002/12/06