[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ )
From: |
Gopal V |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ) |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:13:55 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, James Michael DuPont wrote:
>
> OK gopal. I see your point. I am looking at the Libxml right now, but
> it seems that the xsharp is cleaner code, he does not use any local
> functions.
Yes the libxml2 wrappers in CVS of dotgnu-libs were handcoded ... But there
is another being built using the libxml2-api.xml file distributed with
the libxml2 CVS ... The latter does not use C call-ins like xsharp.
But I cannot check it in till Daniel Veillard adds struct members to
the "<struct/>" tags (which I'm manually adding for testing ,to some structs)
and Rhys finishes off the PInvoke stuff. So then I can build a nice SAX
framework with libxml2 as well improve the DOM stuff dotgnu.xml already
has.
Gopal
--
The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/05
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Adam Treat, 2002/12/05
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Gopal V, 2002/12/06
- ADMIN: Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., David Faure, 2002/12/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/08
- [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ),
Gopal V <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Neil Cawse, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Adam Treat, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Adam Treat, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., David Sugar, 2002/12/06