Re: table.el 1.6.1

[Tak Ota]

Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:00:08 -0500: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> 
wrote:

> > I wasn't very happy about (set-buffer-modified-p (buffer-modified-p))
> > idiom because it is not self descriptive at all.  I hope your change
> 
> subr.el has had
> 
> (defun force-mode-line-update (&optional all)
>   "Force the mode line of the current buffer to be redisplayed.
> With optional non-nil ALL, force redisplay of all mode lines."
>   (if all (save-excursion (set-buffer (other-buffer))))
>   (set-buffer-modified-p (buffer-modified-p)))
> 
> for a long time now.  It does the same, but the name is more descriptive.

Thanks, I didn't know that.  However, not requiring this one is even
better.

-Tak