[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: comint-interrupt-subjob also kills pending input
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: comint-interrupt-subjob also kills pending input |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 03:33:48 -0600 (MDT) |
Another way, used currently to highlight prompts, is to consider any
non-newline-terminated line at the end of the buffer a prompt, but to
update it dynamically so that any wrong guess (e.g. caused by partial
output) is quickly corrected.
Ok, I withdraw the suggestion to distinguish based on prompts.
Let's try making it an option whether to kill the input,
and then we can ask what users prefer.
- Re: comint-interrupt-subjob also kills pending input, Richard Stallman, 2002/06/14
- Re: comint-interrupt-subjob also kills pending input, Miles Bader, 2002/06/16
- Re: comint-interrupt-subjob also kills pending input, Richard Stallman, 2002/06/18
- Re: comint-interrupt-subjob also kills pending input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/06/18
- Re: comint-interrupt-subjob also kills pending input, Miles Bader, 2002/06/18
- Re: comint-interrupt-subjob also kills pending input, Richard Stallman, 2002/06/20
- Re: comint-interrupt-subjob also kills pending input, Miles Bader, 2002/06/20
- Re: comint-interrupt-subjob also kills pending input, Richard Stallman, 2002/06/22
- Re: comint-interrupt-subjob also kills pending input, Miles Bader, 2002/06/22
- Re: comint-interrupt-subjob also kills pending input,
Richard Stallman <=