[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions.
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions. |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Sep 2002 11:54:14 -0400 |
> derived mode of fundamental-mode. text-mode's abbrev table gets
> copied, fundamental-mode's not. I believe that whatever behavior for
Oh, I see. I didn't know there was a fundamental-mode-abbrev-table.
How odd!
fundamental-mode has no local keymap, no hook, no nothing (basically)
but it has its own abbrev-table.
Does anybody know why there is such a thing ?
Stefan
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., (continued)
Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Luc Teirlinck, 2002/09/03
Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Luc Teirlinck, 2002/09/03
Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Luc Teirlinck, 2002/09/03
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/04
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Luc Teirlinck, 2002/09/04
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/06
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., David Masterson, 2002/09/06
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Luc Teirlinck, 2002/09/06
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Luc Teirlinck, 2002/09/06
- Re: Recent attempts at standardizing major mode definitions., Luc Teirlinck, 2002/09/06