[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \201 back again
From: |
Karl Eichwalder |
Subject: |
Re: \201 back again |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Sep 2002 14:47:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
"Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:
> Richard's message indeed shows \201 characters, but that's only
> because they were present in the message itself:
>
> (re-search-forward "[=C2=81=C2=AB=C2=81=C2=BB{}()]" nil t)
>
> See those 0xC2 characters before each 8-bit Latin-9 code?
>
> As for the encoding, it says this:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
The archived message lacks this line. Rmail must learn to add proper
MIME header lines.
> So the question now is how come Richard's Emacs sent such a badly
> encoded message, and why did it think it was in UTF-8 when in fact it
> was in emacs-mule?
Maybe, Emacs asked whether the user wanted to use this "secure
encoding" -- the problem might go away automatically with 21.3 where
unification is enabled.
ShengHuo ZHU <address@hidden> writes:
> Don't panic. The original email is emacs-mule encoded without the
> content-type header. You can type `0 g emacs-mule RET' to fix it.
Thanks for tracking down the problem and telling a work around.
--
address@hidden (work) / address@hidden (home): |
http://www.suse.de/~ke/ | ,__o
Free Translation Project: | _-\_<,
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/ | (*)/'(*)
- \201 back again, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/09/07
- Re: \201 back again, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/20
- Re: \201 back again, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/09/20
- Re: \201 back again, ShengHuo ZHU, 2002/09/20
- Re: \201 back again, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/20
- Re: \201 back again,
Karl Eichwalder <=
- Re: \201 back again, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/21
- Re: \201 back again, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/09/21
- Re: \201 back again, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/22
- Re: \201 back again, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/22
- Re: \201 back again, Andreas Schwab, 2002/09/23
- Re: \201 back again, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/21