Re: \201 back again

[Karl Eichwalder]

"Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:

> I think the archiving scripts remove that line.

The message I received also didn't contain it.  You said it were tagged
as "utf-8" -- but according to ShengHuo ZHU it was emacs-mule, not
UTF-8.

Also, please use uppercase letters for UTF-8 inside the MIME headers.

> ??? RMAIL should not add such headers, they should be present in the
> original message.

Sure.  I meant the mail composing/sending function.  I forgot, RMAIL is
for receiving messages only :-(

> The same effect can be achieved with RMAIL: see rmail-redecode-body.

Good.

-- 
address@hidden (work) / address@hidden (home):              |
http://www.suse.de/~ke/                                  |      ,__o
Free Translation Project:                                |    _-\_<,
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/             |   (*)/'(*)