[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \201 back again
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: \201 back again |
|
Date: |
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 06:42:20 +0200 (IST) |
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
> "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I think the archiving scripts remove that line.
>
> The message I received also didn't contain it. You said it were tagged
> as "utf-8" -- but according to ShengHuo ZHU it was emacs-mule, not
> UTF-8.
It was tagged as utf-8, but actually was encoded in emacs-mule.
- \201 back again, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/09/07
- Re: \201 back again, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/20
- Re: \201 back again, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/09/20
- Re: \201 back again, ShengHuo ZHU, 2002/09/20
- Re: \201 back again, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/20
- Re: \201 back again, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/09/21
- Re: \201 back again, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/21
- Re: \201 back again, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/09/21
- Re: \201 back again,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: \201 back again, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/22
- Re: \201 back again, Andreas Schwab, 2002/09/23
- Re: \201 back again, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/21