[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22

From: Kai Großjohann
Subject: Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:31:38 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

> Personally, I think emacs-mule is not a good idea in this case, since 
> mbox is not Emacs-private format, so some other software should be able 
> to read it.  A good alternative would be to encode each message as what 
> the charset= header says (and add/fix such a header if there is none, or 
> if the one that's there lies).

Maybe "encode" is a bit misleading in this case, as the bytes in the
message are not changed (modulo adding/fixing the Content-Type

It's more the case that the message that's displayed is _de_coded for
viewing, right?

~/.signature is: umop ap!sdn    (Frank Nobis)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]