[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 03:35:20 -0400 |
> I think there's a misunderstanding here.
>
> I think he understood me correctly.
>
> A `subroutine' is not just
> any random function, but it's a function that's implemented in C
> (hence `subrp' and `subr-arity').
>
> That is not our normal usage. A subroutine can be written in any
> language. The subroutine I was talking about was the separate Lisp
> function find-aliases that he proposed. There is no need for it as a
> separate function and that would be more trouble than it is worth.
So the misunderstanding was only on my side.
Stefan "who likes small reusable functions"
- find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/10/21
- Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/21
- Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/10/22
- Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/22
- Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/10/22
- Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/23
- Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command,
Stefan Monnier <=