Re: while-no-input

[Kim F. Storm]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     IIRC, RMS said that using signal like that was very unclean and using 
> throw
>     would be cleaner.
> 
> That is the first thing I said.  Afterwards I agreed to a modified
> version of the change which avoids the ugliness at the Lisp level.

True, but as I read Stefan's comments, removing the ugliness at the
Lisp level comes at the expense of increased ugliness and decreased
functional correctness at the C level.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk