[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: info
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: info |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jan 2003 19:51:59 -0600 (CST) |
Robert Chassell wrote:
In the Dir file, when point is in a description, and you press RET,
Emacs does not visit the Info file, but returns an error message that
says:
Info-next-preorder: No more nodes
It visits the Info file if you are on the actual *-line. Otherwise a
variety of things can happen, depending on the situation.
For instance:
* Emacs Lisp Intro: (eintr).
A simple introduction to Emacs Lisp programming.
* Eshell: (eshell). A command shell implemented in Emacs Lisp.
Note: (eintr) and (eshell) only became visible after yanking.
If I press RETURN on "A simple ...", I would be visiting the Eshell
file, because I am not on the *-line. If Emacs Lisp Intro: were
the last node, I would be getting the error message you got.
Positioning point above the `A" goes to `File: eintr'. We see:
* Narrowing & Widening:: Restricting your and Emacs attention to
a region.
* car cdr & cons:: Fundamental functions in Lisp.
RETURN on "Restricting ..." goes to "Narrowing & Widening::"
RETURN on "a region." goes to "car cdr & cons::"
We all agree that the behavior on the *-line is correct and the
behavior on the next line wrong. What we are discussing is what the
behavior on other lines should be. At first it looks obvious: we want
exactly the same behavior as on the *-line in both cases since we are
on a continuation line. (That is exactly what I originally proposed.)
But somehow things are not that straightforward, for reasons discussed
earlier in this thread.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: info, (continued)
- Re: info, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/29
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/29
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/29
- Re: info, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Kai Großjohann, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Kai Großjohann, 2003/01/30
- Re: info, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/30
- Re: info,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: info, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/31
- Re: info, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/31
- Re: info, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/01/31
Re: info, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/29