[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: info

From: Kai Großjohann
Subject: Re: info
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 21:51:38 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

"Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:

>> From: address@hidden (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
>> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:39:13 +0100
>> First of all, if point is on a menu line, then choose that menu
>> item.  That much we all agree on.
> Doesn't Emacs do that now?  I thought it did.

Oh, it does.  Sorry for that misinformation.

>> Further, if point is on a line starting with whitespace and
>> containing some non-whitespace text, this could be a continuation
>> line for a menu line.
> I think this should be removed and instead Emacs should not go
> anywhere in those cases.  Several examples in this thread show how
> such ad-hoc algorithms can fail miserably.  Can you explain why do you
> think this behavior is better than what the stand-alone reader does?

OK, the standalone behavior is also fine.  (The error message could
be improved, perhaps, but that's a minor thing.)

I agree with the previous statement that an error is better than the
wrong target.
Ambibibentists unite!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]