[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gratuitous changes
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: gratuitous changes |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:44:55 +0100 |
On 04 Feb 2003 08:09:46 -0800, Robert Anderson <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hmm. Didn't you just multiply by N times the problem Stefan was worried
> about?
Perhaps my ability to read English prose is failing me again; I thought
I was doing just what Richard asked for...
> Maybe if you provided the method that you used to get rid of the
> whitespace, people with checked out files can apply the script to their
> sandboxes to minimize the headaches this will cause when they try to
> update.
Script?
Basically, I edited every single file and did
M-x delete-trailing-whitespace [ret]
C-x C-s [ret]
C-x k [ret]
with the caveats that I only edited meaningful files, and I took into
account the encoding (so I didn't end screwing files in
iso-2022 or whatever).
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: gratuitous changes, (continued)
- Re: gratuitous changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/02/02
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Robert Anderson, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: gratuitous changes, Robert Anderson, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Nick Roberts, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Edward O'Connor, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/04