Re: gratuitous changes

[Edward O'Connor]

My $0.02 regarding removing extraneous whitespace, ?\ , etc:

It seems like the occurances of ?\ and ?\        (?\SPC and ?\TAB)
in source files is probably pretty minimal. In the particular
case of ?\      , we have a perfectly good and arguably more
readable substitute in ?\t, so why don't we adopt a good and
arguably more readable substitute for ?\ , say, ?\s?


Ted, who thinks (setq foo ?\ ) looks strange

-- 
Edward O'Connor
address@hidden

Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem.