[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gratuitous changes
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: gratuitous changes |
Date: |
05 Feb 2003 13:51:42 +0900 |
Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden> writes:
> The last sentence might provide some further argument for ?\_
I'd go for that; ?\_ seems more obvious to me than other suggestions.
-Miles
--
Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here,
beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?
- Re: gratuitous changes, (continued)
- Re: gratuitous changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Nick Roberts, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Edward O'Connor, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Kenichi Handa, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: gratuitous changes, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/05
- Re: gratuitous changes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/05
- Re: gratuitous changes, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/07
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/02/05
- Re: gratuitous changes, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/05
- Re: gratuitous changes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/05
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/02/05