[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:50:23 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
> (check_fontset_name): If NAME is nil, return the default fontset.
> Emacs doesn't load on windowing mode on Windows because term/w32-win.el
> contains:
> (set-fontset-font t (make-char 'katakana-jisx0201) '("*" . "JISX0208-SJIS"))
> (set-fontset-font t (make-char 'latin-jisx0201) '("*" . "JISX0208-SJIS"))
> (set-fontset-font t (make-char 'japanese-jisx0208) '("*" . "JISX0208-SJIS"))
> (set-fontset-font t (make-char 'japanese-jisx0208-1978) '("*" .
> "JISX0208-SJIS"))
> It's easy enough to change these t to nil, but, why the change?
> AFAICS, (set-fontset-font [t|nil]...) is not used anywhere on Emacs
> except by term/w32-win.el, and not surprisingly so, as the docs don't
> mention the posibility of NAME being other than a string...
Oops, sorry. Long ago, for already forgotten reason, I
introduced the feature of using t for the default fontset,
but, it seems that the necessity disappeared before I
documented it.
I think nil is better than t for specifying the default
fontset.
I've just documented that NAME nil means the default fontset
in functions of fontset.c, and fixed term/w32-win.el.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el, (continued)
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/02/15
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el, Raja R Harinath, 2003/02/15
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el, Ramakrishnan M, 2003/02/16
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el, Kenichi Handa, 2003/02/17
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el, Stefan Monnier, 2003/02/17
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el, Kenichi Handa, 2003/02/18
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el, Kenichi Handa, 2003/02/19
- Message not available
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el, Kenichi Handa, 2003/02/23
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el, Kenichi Handa, 2003/02/20
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/20
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/21
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/17
- Re: No malayalam glyphs in language/mlm-util.el, Kenichi Handa, 2003/02/17
- Re: no font shown with tamil.el, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/14
- Re: no font shown with tamil.el, 川幡 太一, 2003/02/14
- Re: no font shown with tamil.el, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/15