[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: yet another todo editing system
From: |
Joe Corneli |
Subject: |
Re: yet another todo editing system |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jun 2003 05:05:02 -0500 |
> If someone wants to give a concise description
> of how this mode differs from what we've already got,
> that would be useful for evaluating its usefulness.
Dear Richard,
I'll do what I can...
For whatever its worth I'll add a few things about what I'd like to
have in my code but that I haven't added because of beginning to run
out of steam with Bash.
Let's tell it how it is, and how it could be
How it was, and of course, how it should be
-- From "Lets talk about sex" by Salt 'n' Pepa
* Todo is a list-based hypertext system
* Unlike outline-mode, Todo only displays one "level" of
text at a time. If I want to write an outline of a paper in
Todo, the top page would be a list of links to the
sections.
* Todo can be used to "mark up" text. This is currently done
by giving each list entry a one-letter tag. An example
of the source for a Todo list is:
<m> Math <<math_hw>>
<h> Physics <<physics_hw>>
<h> Astronomy <<astronomy_hw>>
<w> Hacking <<hacking>>
< > Don't forget to sleep!
The tags are useful for exporting to other document formats --
for example, it would be simple to write a macro that would
export the above Todo list to HTML that looks like this:
<h3>MONDAY</h3>
<p>
<a href="math_hw.html">Math</a>
</p>
<h3>THURSDAY</h3>
<p>
<a href="physics_hw.html">Physics</a>
<a href="astronomy_hw.html">Astronomy</a>
</p>
<h3>WEEKEND<h3>
<p>
<a href="hacking.html">Hacking</a>
</p>
<p>
Don't forget to sleep!
</p>
o I would like to have a simple system for people to specify
their own macros for exporting -- but to date I have just
written the ones I've needed into the code.
o By exporting all the lists in a "path" (as in, math_hw*), you
can build hypertext outlines. It is not currently possible to
merge things into one document while exporting, but that would
be very useful.
* Unlike Emacs Wiki or Hyperbole, Todo provides a highly structured
text editing/viewing environment. Everything you see is
is a list or an "atom"; an atom is either a simple string or a
link. Unlike with these packages, in Todo links do not appear
automatically. (At least not currently!)
The best you could do to approximate Todo in Wiki would
leave you with source files that look like something like
this:
f jane austin
m shakespeare
m baudelaire
m baudrillard
F AustinPublicLibrary
E BookStore
This could of course be "unstudlified" upon being exported.
But if I wanted to include a link like
$\sum_{j=1}{\infty}j^{1/j}$
then I'd be pretty much hosed if I tried to use Wiki.
I'm not sure how you would do this stuff with Hyperbole.
o Final note about extensions to Todo -- I think it would be
kind of cool to expand the number of kinds of links, to
include executables or functions (as in <<!sort-lines>>)
or tex(t) files (as in <<~/TeX/impossibility_proof.tex>>).
Eventually I think it would be kind of cool to make Todo
into a new mode for editing Lisp code...
Joe Corneli
- Re: yet another todo editing system, (continued)
- Re: yet another todo editing system, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/09
- Re: yet another todo editing system, Joe Corneli, 2003/06/09
- Re: yet another todo editing system, Alex Schroeder, 2003/06/09
- Re: yet another todo editing system, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/06/09
- Re: yet another todo editing system, Alex Schroeder, 2003/06/08
- Re: yet another todo editing system, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/08
- Re: yet another todo editing system,
Joe Corneli <=
- Re: yet another todo editing system, Joe Corneli, 2003/06/09
- Re: yet another todo editing system, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/15
- Re: yet another todo editing system, Joe Corneli, 2003/06/15
- Re: yet another todo editing system, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/16
- Re: Gud lord!, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/08
- Re: Gud lord!, Jonathan Walther, 2003/06/08
- Re: Gud lord!, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/09
- Re: Gud lord!, Robert Anderson, 2003/06/09
- Re: Gud lord!, Jonathan Walther, 2003/06/09
- Re: Gud lord!, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/10