[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior? |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:33:58 +0200 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:25:57 -0500
>
> I would expect people to design an MTAs not to wait very long
> in the process that you created to send the mail.
I'm not an expert, but I always thought that the amount of time they
wait is determined by the TCP/IP time-out, which is typically 1 or 2
minutes. At least for those cases where the destination doesn't
respond.
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, (continued)
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Ian Jackson, 2004/01/26
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Jan D., 2004/01/26
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Ian Jackson, 2004/01/26
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Jan D., 2004/01/26
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Ian Jackson, 2004/01/26
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/27
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/27
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/29
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/25
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/23
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/01/23
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Ian Jackson, 2004/01/26
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/01/26
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/26
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/01/26
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/26
- Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/27
Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?, Rob Browning, 2004/01/29