[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
Jari Aalto+mail.linux |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Mar 2004 02:11:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) (i386-msvc-nt5.0.2195) |
* 2004-03-25 no-spam <AT> cua.dk (Kim Storm) gmane.emacs.devel
* <http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&address@hidden>
| Danilo Segan <dsegan <AT> gmx.net> writes:
|
| > Hi Jari, Lucas, Juanma,
|
| > > And, ` is on AltGR 7 here, so basically absolutely unusable on French
| > > keyboard layouts. Of course next-error is bound to something else
| >
| > Which would only go so far to recommend assigning M-g to next-error,
| > perhaps? ;)
|
|
| This brings me to another pet of mine ...
|
| M-x compile and M-x recompile
|
| What about using a new "compile prefix" C-x c with bindings like:
|
| C-x c c => compile
| C-x c r => recompile
| C-x c n => next error
| C-x c p => prev error
| C-x c g => grep
|
Excellent idea
|
| C-x c l => goto-line
But not this. The whole point of M-g being so useful for goto-line
is its sing keys nature. If it were put to C-x c l ir to any other
key that requires "more keystrokes", it just don't cut the idea.
It's not just question of Being gogo-line mapping, it really needs to
be M-g. The de facto, that it has been for years in the user
community. Let's follow what's already there.
I would hate wasting keystrokes to reach other than M-g in a
PHP debugging sessions - staring those Web page errors.
It's fortunately Alt-g in my keyboard. For other systems I warrant
goto-line to a function key of its own. It's really essential for
fluent programming.
Jari
--
http://tiny-tools.sourceforge.net/
Swatch @time http://www.mir.com.my/iTime/itime.htm
http://www.ryanthiessen.com/swatch/resources.htm
Use Licenses! http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6225
Which Licence? http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4825
OSI Licences http://www.opensource.org/licenses/
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Danilo Segan, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Danilo Segan, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juri Linkov, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Joachim Nilsson, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
Jari Aalto+mail.linux <=
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto+mail.emacs, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25