[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
25 Mar 2004 14:35:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Danilo Segan <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Jari, Lucas, Juanma,
> > And, ` is on AltGR 7 here, so basically absolutely unusable on French
> > keyboard layouts. Of course next-error is bound to something else
>
> Which would only go so far to recommend assigning M-g to next-error,
> perhaps? ;)
This brings me to another pet of mine ...
M-x compile and M-x recompile
What about using a new "compile prefix" C-x c with bindings like:
C-x c c => compile
C-x c r => recompile
C-x c n => next error
C-x c p => prev error
C-x c g => grep
and:
C-x c l => goto-line
..
Unfortunately, using C-x c has a high danger of someone typing C-x C-c
which is probably why it isn't used :-(
But C-x C-c has always been too risky for my fingers, so I moved
that to C-x C-c C-x a LOOOOOONG time ago.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto+mail.linux, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Danilo Segan, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Alan Shutko, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Lucas, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Danilo Segan, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Danilo Segan, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juri Linkov, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Joachim Nilsson, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto+mail.linux, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/26