[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
26 Mar 2004 17:40:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Per Abrahamsen <address@hidden> writes:
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Isn't AUCTeX's central dispatcher supposed to be a "better compile"
>
> Yes it was. Or rather, it was supposed to be the mode specific
> version of compile. It even uses compile for some subtasks.
>
> I originally chose C-c C-c for that task in AUC TeX because that was
> the binding I thought of as the standard for compile.
>
> > And it can't be that hard to add `make' to the list of AUCTeX
> > actions, can it?
>
> It already is there.
Hmm. Not in my version of AUCTeX, and that has been updated from the
CVS repository about 10 minutes ago. And considering that I am the
current maintainer of AUCTeX, I am pretty sure that it is not checked
into a branch.
Tell me more.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/31
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
David Kastrup <=
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Danilo Segan, 2004/03/25