[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RMAIL slows
From: |
Robert J. Chassell |
Subject: |
Re: RMAIL slows |
Date: |
Fri, 6 May 2005 15:34:40 +0000 (UTC) |
> ... Can you go to the RMAIL buffer and try something like
>
> (length (save-restriction (widen) (overlays-in (point-min) (point-max))))
> 6128
How many did you expect?
Under 1000. Now my RMAIL has slowed even more and I have 13604 overlays.
I will follow RMS' suggestion, but it may be a few days before my
RMAIL slows again enough.
--
Robert J. Chassell
address@hidden GnuPG Key ID: 004B4AC8
http://www.rattlesnake.com http://www.teak.cc
- Re: RMAIL slows, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/05/04
- Re: RMAIL slows, Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/05
- Re: RMAIL slows, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/05/05
- Re: RMAIL slows, Kevin Rodgers, 2005/05/05
- Re: RMAIL slows,
Robert J. Chassell <=
- Re: RMAIL slows, Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/06
- Re: RMAIL slows, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/05/06
- Re: RMAIL slows, Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/06
- Re: RMAIL slows, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/05/07
- Re: RMAIL slows, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/05/10
- Should overlays evaporate by default?, Peter Whaite, 2005/05/10
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/11
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/05/12
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/12
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/05/13