[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RMAIL slows
From: |
Robert J. Chassell |
Subject: |
Re: RMAIL slows |
Date: |
Sat, 7 May 2005 11:08:19 +0000 (UTC) |
> and then look at the *overlays* buffer,
Not only they overlap but they're empty.
Would 2144619 happen to be at/near the end of the RMAIL buffer (or at/near
the last position of the buffer every displayed)?
Yes. I am not sure whether that number came when I was at the end or
near the end.
Thank you for the patch. I will try a new instance of Emacs with the
hook for goto-address in my .emacs and with your fix.
--
Robert J. Chassell
address@hidden GnuPG Key ID: 004B4AC8
http://www.rattlesnake.com http://www.teak.cc
- Re: RMAIL slows, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/05/04
- Re: RMAIL slows, Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/05
- Re: RMAIL slows, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/05/05
- Re: RMAIL slows, Kevin Rodgers, 2005/05/05
- Re: RMAIL slows, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/05/06
- Re: RMAIL slows, Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/06
- Re: RMAIL slows, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/05/06
- Re: RMAIL slows, Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/06
- Re: RMAIL slows,
Robert J. Chassell <=
- Re: RMAIL slows, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/05/10
- Should overlays evaporate by default?, Peter Whaite, 2005/05/10
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/11
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/05/12
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/12
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/05/13
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/13
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Peter Whaite, 2005/05/16
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/17
- Re: Should overlays evaporate by default?, Peter Whaite, 2005/05/17