[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: W32 version crashes on C-g
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: W32 version crashes on C-g |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:42:50 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 13:45:50 +0100
> From: "Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> On 3/18/06, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Please feel free to suggest such refinements.
>
> You only have to take a look at Lennart's EmacsW32 pages to see which
> kinds of things aren't easy for beginners, and are not described in
> nt/INSTALL.
Well, I already read Lennart's pages and incorporated in nt/INSTALL
everything I thought was worthwhile. So please suggest specific
refinements, if you think there's more to say.
> Or, to put it in another way: Kim can hardly be considered a newbie,
> and it's clear that he could have set up a working environment and
> compiled Emacs, given a little time. But he hadn't the time, he looked
> at nt/INSTALL and did not find what he needed. Whether that's a
> problem in contents or presentation, I don't know.
I didn't suggest to dismiss Kim's gripes. I'm trying to establish
what should be added to or modified in nt/INSTALL. I'm not arguing
that it is perfect and should not be changed.
Kim mentioned several additions, like detailed configure and build
instructions and a pointer to Lennart's site, which are already there.
I'm trying to figure out what is NOT there, or what should be reworded
to be more clear.
> > I find it very simple, perhaps because the first thing I do is
> > download GCC, Binutils, and every other ported GNU package (Coreutils,
> > Sed, Grep, Gawk, Make, Texinfo, Diffutils, and Patch) one needs for
> > decent development.
>
> Perhaps. I've been developing on Windows for years and didn't need
> most of that, until I started hacking Emacs; so your definition of
> "decent development" and mine are dissimilar.
Do we all agree that instructions to set up a suitable development
environment is the _only_ thing that is currently missing? Or does
something else Need Work (tm)?
- Re: Binaries for W32 (was: W32 version crashes on C-g), (continued)
- Re: Binaries for W32 (was: W32 version crashes on C-g), Lennart Borgman, 2006/03/17
- RE: Binaries for W32 (was: W32 version crashes on C-g), Drew Adams, 2006/03/17
- RE: Binaries for W32 (was: W32 version crashes on C-g), Drew Adams, 2006/03/20
- Re: Binaries for W32 (was: W32 version crashes on C-g), Juanma Barranquero, 2006/03/21
- Re: Binaries for W32 (was: W32 version crashes on C-g), Mathias Dahl, 2006/03/22
- Re: Binaries for W32 (was: W32 version crashes on C-g), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/03/25
- Re: W32 version crashes on C-g, Kim F. Storm, 2006/03/17
- Re: W32 version crashes on C-g, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/03/18
- Re: W32 version crashes on C-g, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/03/18
- Re: W32 version crashes on C-g, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/03/18
- Re: W32 version crashes on C-g,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: W32 version crashes on C-g, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/03/18
- Re: W32 version crashes on C-g, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/03/18
- Re: W32 version crashes on C-g, Lennart Borgman, 2006/03/18
- Re: W32 version crashes on C-g, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/03/18
- Re: W32 version crashes on C-g, Lennart Borgman, 2006/03/18
- Re: W32 version crashes on C-g, Kim F. Storm, 2006/03/18
- Re: W32 version crashes on C-g, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/03/21
- Re: W32 version crashes on C-g, Kim F. Storm, 2006/03/21
- Re: W32 version crashes on C-g, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/03/21
- RE: W32 version crashes on C-g, Drew Adams, 2006/03/20